Jonathan White
UAL Extended Diploma in Creative Media Production & Technology
Candidate Number: 319325
Production Day 1 (24th March)
Today was the 24th of March, my first day of filming for the production. As expected, I was very nervous as there were a lot of things to think about, particularly due to the fact it had felt as if I had not help a camera in quite a while. I suppose this comes down to the lack of practical work I did (regarding research) - although I had done some to help me set up interviews, some further practice could have helped to counteract the nerves. Nevertheless, it was time to start shooting some footage.
Throughout today’s shoot I encountered many issues and problems; I will be discussing them here, below, talking about how I dealt with the problem and whether there could have been anything that I could have done before hand to help prevent this issue. Learning, understanding and overcoming problems are the only way in which you are going to be able to prevent them from happening again in the future. Within this discussion, I will also pick up on specific practical skills that I can show evidence of achieving.
The first problem of the day that I encountered was the fact that the LAV microphone’s were not set up like how they were at college. This is a problem that could have been easily fixed if I were to have just looked in the box before filming and would have therefore been able to prepare this issue. The image below shows the problem I encountered (nothing was built).

This was honestly really frustrating and I was quite annoyed at myself that I had not previously checked for this issue as it meant I now had to read the instructions on how to set it up, and this was simply more time wasted. I was eventually able to understand how to piece it together, so I connected this to the camera and checked the audio levels were coming through okay on the wireless microphone. I did have to adjust the audio levels very slightly as they were a little quiet, so I increased the gain to +3db as this just buffed it very sightly.
After having sorted the audio issue, I continued to prep the rest of the equipment. The images below show the process of me setting up the room for the interview. This includes the lighting, camera and having audio ready too. The images below show the before and after of everything being set up.


Furthermore, below you can see what the frame looks like from the 2 cameras that I set up. I help my finger out for the subject to look at, as this is where I am going to be positioned when asking the questions. I have learnt through my research that eye contact and reassuring the interviewee throughout the interview is important, so the end of finger tip simulates where my eyes are going to be for the interviewee to look at.

However, after looking back at the shots, I realised a fatal error that I made. I had become so confused by the fact I only had one light and had to use natural light in place of a standing light, I did not position the the subject correctly. The current situation was the subject was looking away from the light, and instead, the key light should be on the far side, so that they are looking towards the light. This meant that I had to spend more time than otherwise planned to fix the mistake I had made.
This problem all stems from the fact that I could not get 3 lights for my conventional 3 point lighting that I had originally planned for having and practiced with within my primary research too.
To overcome this problem, I dimmed the standing light, to make it far less harsh on the face, closed the curtain very slightly and positioned the subject so that they were facing the opposite direction (towards the key light). Then all I had to do was mirror swap the cameras, ensuring that I had a nice close up on the darker side of the face. The new framing of the camera can be seen below.


Now that I had everything set up (audio, lights and camera), I was ready to start filming. In my opinion I think the filming actually went quite well. I’m particularly happy with the positioning of the subject within the frame. I tried really hard to achieve a conventional and well crafted shot, so Im happy with the outcome here. This fills me with confidence for tomorrows shoot too as I will be doing a very similar thing here too. This also includes the rotation and positioning of subjects head as eyeline is very important. To achieve the effect of the subject looking their eye-level directly off frame, I used a technique. This technique was to crouch down and sit still. Although it sounds very simple, when human’s speak with one another face to face, we always address and look towards the other person’s eyes. If I had asked the subject to look at my torso and speak instead, I would take a good guess and bet on the fact that at some point their eyes would have flicked upwards to address and look at my eyes. I know this because my interviewee here is not a professional actor so is unlikely to have the capabilities of doing something like this. To add to this, maintaining eye contact with the subject throughout the interview is also very important for ensuring their confidence. It can be quite nerve-wracking, for some, being in front of a camera and being asked questions, so understanding the position they are in and reassuring them throughout the interview is very important. They are also more likely to say something meaningful and perhaps personal if you show a sign of respect by showing that you are listening. To show this, throughout the interview I occasionally and naturally gave nods of assurance to my interviewee.
Despite the positives, there were some negatives that I need to think about moving forward. As stated before hand, I found setting up the lighting for the interview really difficult because I did not have three lights for three point lighting like I had originally planned for. To overcome this, I used natural lighting as the key light for my scene. Despite this being a good idea in the moment, the lighting throughout the scene drastically changed due to clouds moving outside. This was not something I had noticed during the recording as it happens so subtly and often in life that you don’t actively think about it happening. When logging this footage, I will have to make the decision to see whether it has affected the filming that much, as if I were to cut between sentences, lighting may differ and make it too jarring for an audience member to go without realising. To overcome this issue, I should have perhaps used lighting sources in the house to light my interviewee. Keeping it as a controlled environment would have been the safest bet for me here, but nevertheless, I have learnt and been able to understand my mistake.
After having completed the interview with Judith, I then returned back to my production schedule to remind myself of the next task that needed to be completed. As you can see below, the next task was to get b-roll of Eddie’s plastic cutlery in the kitchen. This was fairly simple to do and I’m happy with the result overall. When looking at the scene I had to play with (and the objects that would be in the scene). I removed any excess objects such as a tub of butter that was on the counter, as I wanted the kitchen to look tidy and clean. I then gave the surface a quick clean too.

Now that I had the misenscene set, I had to think about how it was going to be lit. I knew before hand that I wanted a very natural feel, so to do this I bought in the light and changed the lighting temperature so much that it fitted, and resembled the light coming through the window as much as I could. This essentially allowed me to change the strength of the sky’s light entering the scene, allowing me the creative freedom to add as much or as little extra natural light as I needed.
From here, I took several different shots with varying shot types and angles to give me a choice in the edit for which one I liked best.
​
After completing this, the next task was to film with Eddie. I had quite a lot to film here – most of it being b-roll regarding his pets. Before moving onto this, due to the filming about to be taking place, I looked back at the risk assessments to remind myself of the potential hazards working with animals may involve. Its important to do this as risk assessments aren’t just something you create for the sake of it, they give real advice and guidance to ensure that you are able to film safely.
​
Despite thinking I was about to film the b-roll, I hadn’t yet taken all of the equipment away and actually, it was more effective to record his interview now. This was okay as we would still have enough light outside for filming the chickens b-roll too. Therefore, we got straight to recording the interview and started with the first question.
​
It went well at first, but it very quickly declined. Eddie was beginning to take very long thinking about what he wanted to say to the questions and, I believe, started to overthink/panic about the situation. I tried several different techniques to try and help relieve any pressure he may have, but nothing was working. This was not good at all as I needed Eddie in the documentary – particularly due to the amount of visual content I had planned too. On a personal level, it would be a real shame to not have him in the doc; he is the reason I had decided to produce this and I know that he has great things to say, he just doesn’t like to talk about himself.
​
My idea to propose to Eddie is to instead of me being in the room with him to record, just having him in his own room speaking and answering the questions. No people looking at him, no pressure to answer them quickly. It’s a subject he doesn’t like to speak about and I could understand he was quite ashamed about (hence he didn’t want to speak about it earlier today). I know he is willing to do it and I know he wants to as I have spoke to him about it prior to todays recording session and he has been made fully aware of all the questions too - he was just having a bad day. All I can hope for is that on a good day he is up for speaking about it. The good thing is that I do live with him meaning my schedule can suit his needs and we can essentially film whenever he is happy to.
This is obviously a huge set back and a real shame to have to be saying this but I don’t know if I’ll be able to get him back in the documentary. I’m sort of in an ethical and moral dilemma because ethically Eddie has to because he signed a legal form to state he would be a part of the documentary, but morally it is not right to force him to do something he obviously doesn’t want to do.
Production Day 2 (26th March)
26th March was the 2nd day of filming for my production. The day included Jolene’s interview and all b-roll with her too. I had an hour and 45 minute drive ahead of me, intending to arrive at 11am, so I left mine at 9:00am, following the timings on my production schedule. The image below shows the boot of my car where I all of the equipment ready to go. Before setting off I double-checked every bag and bought all the spare batteries I had to ensure that I would have absolutely no issues regarding the equipment – it would be an absolute pain if I would have to go back to Jolene and reshoot if I had forgotten a piece of equipment.

As you can see by the message below, we arrived 20 minutes early to her house, so I sent her a quick message asking if it would be okay if we could start early. Gladly she said yes and that would be no worries at all, which was great, as it meant that firstly I would not have to wait around, but secondly, and more importantly, it would mean that I am ahead of schedule straight from the get-go.

When entering her house, I spent a good few minutes saying hello and greeting her mum too. It’s important that this first interaction goes well and they understand I am a trusting and genuine filmmaker. This is important for Jolene as she would feel more comfortable working with me; it is also true for her mum as she needs to feel comfortable with having me in her house and filming an interview with her daughter. They were both very lovely people so this was a really good start. I then took the next 15 minutes or so setting up my equipment in the living room. Within this time, I also spoke with Jolene on a more casual setting just so that I could get to know her and her background more. This would help me to direct the conversations I have with her in the interview and also, once again, gain that genuine trust and likeability. I had already planned beforehand which seat I would need her to sit in, so I instructed her to sit in the seat in the corner. This was because of the window that would act as a nice key light for her. I have been able to understand and recognise the natural lighting problem I had last filming session, but in all honestly, there wasn’t any other opportunity or choice here as she was in the process of moving house and there were no other lights to use except the ceiling light. This was okay as firstly, the weather was good and it was generally quite cloudy so the lighting should not change too drastically and now that I was more aware of this issue, I could recognise it if it were to occur.
Now that all equipment was set up, I then began the actual interview process. Overall, I am very happy with how it went: the entire filming process went very smoothy. I am actually quite proud of myself during this interview filming as I was able to embed my questions into more of a conversational style. By this, I mean that I didn’t just ask the question and then gain a response, I actively listened to what was being said and then spoke further on this, inducing her to say even more on the topic. This led to some really great material that otherwise wouldn’t have been discussed. The video below shows how I am giving Jolene direct eye contact and acknowledgement as she speaks, which fills her with confidence and makes it easier for her to talk.

After filming the interview with Jolene, I then began filming the b-roll with her. I had already told her what we would be shooting here, so it was nothing that she wouldn’t expect to already be doing which was great because throughout this filming, she was so supportive and easy to work with. I think the trust and relationship I gained through filming the interview beforehand added to making it easier for me to work with her. The reason I say this is because I was essentially having her ‘act’, and she is not an actor so it's understandable as to why it would be awkward for her here. I am super happy with the footage I got here as I think it looks really professional and well thought through. Here are some of my favourite shots from this shoot:



I will go into further detail, breaking down these shots within my LO6 evaluation and reflection.
​
All-in-all I am very happy with today’s production day and I am looking forward to the next production day! I also left Jolene a message after reviewing the footage - this can be seen below.

Production Day 3 (29th March)
Production Day 5
Today was Friday 29th March, the day of my interview with Erin. My interview with Erin was on Zoom today, instead of in person. This was due to logistical reasons, as otherwise, I would have loved to film in person. This logistical reasoning comes down to budget, and although filming in person would have allowed me to control the visual and audio elements of the recording far better than Zoom, Zoom is far better than nothing. Recording an interview online would not have changed what Erin would have said, and I fully believe that what’s said in a documentary is the most important aspect – I am not stopping my logistical constraints from preventing the final outcome effectiveness.
​
To begin, I joined the Zoom call meeting 5 minutes before the time we agreed upon starting as I wanted to ensure I was there for when Erin joined. I had my notepad ready with all the questions written down so that I could remind myself of those that needed to be asked. Although I had already previously sent Erin the questions (and in fact I later found out that she had prepped detailed responses to help her) it was good to have the questions there just to ensure that nothing was being missed out; it would have been the absolute worst to have ended the call and then later realised that I needed her to answer another question. Furthermore, though she would have had to just answer one more question, several different factors would have made the footage look different (the main ones being positioning of the camera and lighting).
​
Once she joined, I spent a few minutes to introduce myself and saying hi. I did this because we had never spoken to each other before so gaining a positive vibe and relationship from her was important – this is the same principle as my in-person interview with Jolene. After, I then got straight into the questions. Asking the questions was pretty self explanatory – I essentially just went over the questions and stated the sorts of topics that she could discuss within her answer. Saying this allows me to direct her answer to tailor my needs. Throughout her response I made sure to look interested and awake (not that I wasn’t!) as engaging with your interviewee helps them feel more confident and they lead on to say more and given better responses. Furthermore, as I knew I was recording two separate audio files, one for my audio input, and one for Erin’s, I wasn’t worried about making noises such as ‘yea’ to further show my engagement with what she was saying. I would simply be able to just use Erin’s audio track in the edit and the audience would not hear any of what I was saying.
​
Overall, I thought she was a very good speaker and she gave some really insightful thoughts on living with misophonia, particularly regarding working in a real work environment. The video below shows the behind-the-scenes footage of me recording the interview with her.
Production Day 4 (1st April)
Today was the day for shooting scene 1 of my documentary. This filming was unlike any I have done before in this project because it’s for an entirely different genre. I was working with actors; having to think more about the creative justifications for both technical and creative decisions made regarding mise-en-scene in order for it to fit the mood; and shooting my shots (and recording audio) in a far more formatted way. Shooting a film scene is so different, and you can see that by the differences I have just listed.
It was important to remember that though the differences are there and, creatively, there are more things to think about, I shouldn’t forget the basic principles. One of the most important principles that followed through both interview filming and shooting a film scene, is composition. Composing a frame to suit the conventional requirements for the specific genre/medium I am trying to reflect is perhaps the easiest and most simple way to engage an audience. An example of this in filming an interview is having the interviewee positioned to one side of the frame and having them look towards the empty space. This is a very common convention because it feels most natural for us as an audience (it would be awkward if they were looking directly off-frame – unless for creative purposes). An example of this in filming scene 1 was the use of close-ups. I framed my shots to close-ups within this scene as I wanted to create an overwhelming uneasiness – my preferred reading would be for the audience to feel uncomfortable whilst watching, as this reflects the feeling of those with misophonia. You can see the difference between the thought process behind documentary and film – documentary, in my case, has a more basic set-up, but important that it’s done right, and film is far more creative and somewhat interruptive.
By producing two different types of mediums, I have been able to prove that I can effectively use both sets of skills. To view the production process of filming scene one, click on the video below. Within this you will also see the problems I faced, how I overcame them, and proof of the skills I have used.
As stated, a lot of the skills I have used within the making of this scene I have not had to use in the other parts of my filming, this shows how I have been able to use the skills I have learnt over the formative units and reapply them into this one. This was obviously quite challenging as in all honestly, the last time I made an actual film was last FMP, a year ago. However, despite saying this, the formative units in between now and then have all played a huge role too, despite not being directly connected. The skill that has improved drastically from last FMP to now, is definitely confidence. This spans over the documentary and scene 1 filming, but looking specific at todays filming, confidence played a huge role in my ability to capture what I envisioned. I remember having stuggles last year to position the camera properly or worrying about other things and having self doubt about what I’m making. As I’ve been able to improve upon general skills over the past year, Ive been able to feel more confident in my practical skills, therefore leading me to feel more confident with my creative thoughts and ideas too. A great example of this is the sheer fact that 90% of the shots in this scene were close ups, specifically of people. This can be quite awkward, but with confidence, has allowed me to capture the shot I wanted.
​
Overall, I am very happy with what I have been able to achieve, and am actually quite proud of the scene I have been able to construct.
Production Day 5/6 (10th/11th April)
Production Day 5
Tonight I have been able to shoot b-roll for Eddie’s interview that is hopefully happening tomorrow! I had spoken to Eddie in further detail about his role within the documentary and I have been able to convince him to give it another go, so it’s good to see that hopefully the interview tomorrow is going to happen. Within this interview he will be discussing his pets, so this b-roll is dedicated to acting as a visual element for this section of his response.
I was planning on shooting all of the animals today (hamster, snake and chickens), but due to the weather and how bright it was outside, I made the creative and logistical decision not to film the chickens. This decision was creative in the fact that rain and dark lighting would not have fit the misenscene of what I want, and logistical with the fact that the rain may have damaged the equipment. I’m not overly worried about this problem however, as I had planned for his to possibly happen and will simply film tomorrow instead. This is particularly possible with the fact I’m not actually in college on a Thursday, so I have the whole day’s opportunity to film this footage (and the interview too).
Thinking about how the filming from tonight went, I think it went very well. I decided to film the snake first, as this is what I had in my original plan, and it was best that Eddie does this as if it were the other way around, and Eddie did not wash the smell of his hands entirely, the snake could have smelt the hamster and striked Eddie. This would have been an awful risk, so it was important we did this first. Filming the snake went so well – I am super happy with the footage that turned out. The image below shows me reviewing a bit of the footage mid way through the shoot to ensure everything was coming out okay. You can see in the image how I set up my light – just a simple, natural temperature light lighting the area with which Eddie is holding the snake.
During this shoot, I was also able to get an extra shot of the outside of the vivarium which I didn’t actually plan for. Though I didn’t plan it, I felt as if it was absolutely valid to film it anyway, as the more footage I have, the more creative freedom I have in the edit!
One problem I had whilst shooting is that although the lens on the camera is 18-135mm, meaning the zoom on it is actually very good for a kit lens, I did sometimes feel as if I had to get quite close to the snake to get the close ups I wanted. It was okay because I knew the snake wouldn’t strike, but it’s just that inevitable fear factor.

After filming the snake, it was then time to move onto the hamster. To protect ourselves from bacteria and disease, me and Eddie both washed our hands with warm water and soap. Although I did not handle the snake at all, it doesn’t hurt to do so.
Once again, filming went really well and smoothy. It actually went a lot quicker than I thought too. I turned on the main light in his bedroom, set up the standing light to eliminate shadows and hit record. There wasn’t a whole lot of instructing to do either as all I needed were some actuality shots (he talks about the hamster so I show the hamster on screen).
Overall, I am very happy with how todays shoot went and I am looking forward to completing the rest of it tomorrow.

Production Day 6
The morning of the shoot day was very positive – Eddie was in a good mood which was great as this was required for the interview. I decided to do the interview in the living room, where I had done it with Judith a few weeks ago, as this was where firstly, he naturally was, and secondly, I knew the audio sounded good here. Though I had planned to do it in his bedroom, the only reason I was going to do it there was because this is where he feels comfortable. As he was naturally comfortable in this location, it made sense to record it here. As the interview was only being recorded via sound, there was no need to worry about suitability of location regarding the creative justification of it, so this was okay too.
To add to the fact it was only being recorded via sound, this made the set up process far quicker – I did not need to worry about lights, camera and misenscene. Though I obviously would have preferred to capture video too, I knew from the get-go that I was not filming him, so I quite appreciative of how quick it was to set up. The equipment I used was the same wireless LAV mics I had used for all other interviewees in person, and ironincally a DSLR camera. The reason I had a camera was because the audio of Eddie speaking went via the microphone, transmitted, using binary, to the transmitter (on top of the camera) and plugged directly into the audio input of the camera. As I was literally only using the camera for recording the audio, I did not need to set it up anywhere. I made the conscious decision to keep the camera near me and not pointed towards Eddie, as I know how he felt last time when I had it set up on the tripod.
Some particular techniques I used to help Eddie during the interview process were:
- 
Camera not being pointed at him 
- 
Not giving him eye contact as he spoke (allowed him to shut off and focus on what he was saying). This goes against what I did for all other interviewees, but shows that people are different and have different required needs. 
- 
I gave him the choice of which questions he wanted to answer first. This allowed him to not panic and stress over the answer of a particular question, and instead, come back to it afterwards 
- 
Gave him plenty of time to answer the questions and did not rush him at all. This was particularly true for his interview because he also has quite a sever stutter, meaning some sentences took minutes to get right 
- 
Generally acting professionally, just as I would with any other interview, to ensure that he feels the right to say what ever he likes for the doc. 
Additionally, to show evidence of being able to effectively record sound, and do so at an appropriate level, please watch the video below.
Production Day 7 (12th April)
The filming with Tom went really well – I’m super happy with the comments he made, particularly in the final section where he discusses the sorts of websites/books people can go to in order to find out more. Spreading awareness on the topic like he has done will add great value to the documentary. Furthermore, a lot of what he said linked really well with what others have said too, meaning I’m going to be able to create some really nice connections within each section. This is something I was worried about before filming everyone, as I was scared whether they all might have said something that answers the question but doesn’t link to one another – however this is not the case. There are two reasons why this is the case: firstly, luck because the questions could have been interrupted in many ways (by this I don’t mean that the questions were bad, but more the fact that there are lots of different things to talk about), and secondly, I directed their answers to try an accommodate for what I wanted to be said.
The video below shows the interview from behind the scenes, allowing you to see what I say to him and how my facial expressions and reactions to his speech keep him speaking confidently about the subject matter.
Apart from this, there is not too much to say. I think the fact I had already done a Zoom call interview with Erin before made this one a lot easier. I felt very little stress doing the interview and I knew exactly what to do in terms of how to record his camera and ensure I was capturing the audio too. Furthermore, I think because I had a chat to him on Zoom a few weeks ago when we were discussing his participation within the doc, having already broken the ice and spoken to him before, it was very easy to chat and begin the interview. This shows to me that having those pre-interview chats are very important in helping any social anxiety you may have. As the pre-interview chat I had with Tom was on zoom so I could see and hear him, I was a lot less nervous for the interview than someone like Jolene where I had only ever messaged them on Instagram to communicate and was now meeting them in real life. This is definitely something I will take away from this experience as in order to get good answers in an interview, not only does the interviewee need to be relaxed, but you, the interviewer, needs to be too.